The 90% rule, is that this is the rule. Ok?

It’s the absolute rule, and it stands for all cases.

Well, it is until it’s questioned atleast. But then, it’s still the rule.

But if you ask again, and then ask why it’s a rule. And go on to explain how it shouldn’t apply under these circumstances, to you, and your case specifically, it’s still the rule, for everyone. Well, for everyone but you. They are after all very unique circumstances, that make this specific rule: harsh, unfair, unreasonable, inconsiderate, thoughtless and wildly obtuse if used in application to your case. The very mechanism itself of the rule shouldn’t be used in such cases. Well, it should, infact cases that went before should perhaps be re-trialed. Is there a way for me to contact everyone that has mistakenly abided by this rule? What if they knew that this rule was not always in effect. And given more detail, the rule would not have applied to their case. Infact the purpose of the ruling was entirely supposed to be for cases unlike most of those it’s ruled over, held to account, applied to and been utilised for. Thankyou for reminding me of this rule.